that thing is so bad, it's a hoot. Thanks for the chuckle!
Most of the stars have centrils which is unusual in a grade below VF. The eagle's toes are pretty sharp too.
I am guessing it will be deemed AT. Why do I think that? Weird purple pink color scattered around, if the images are accurate. Just my opinion,...
Amen, Brother!
don't think so; mintmark position and morphology are a bit different: [IMG]
exactly. I'm not ashamed to own this one: [IMG] [IMG] or this one: [IMG] [IMG] just be patient and stay away from the overly shiny cleaned/dipped...
The big images help a lot. I see some mint made polish lines, mainly adjacent to the large devices, and a lot of post mint "scritchiness" in the...
You can put together a nice set of most dates in vf for around what you are proposing. that's what I have been doing and lack the 1815 of course...
my opinion, it's a myriad of tiny contact marks on semi prooflike surfaces which tends to accentuate the marks under photo lighting. Bill's...
NIce halves, aceskings
Too many fakes out there, unless you are confident in your counterfeit detection abilities I would pass.
The last one looks to me like an AU58, but probably graded MS. Old dip, not overdone, and album retoned. Perfectly acceptable.
74-cc wide cc, very scarce. pcgs xf 45 [IMG] [IMG]
Gerry Fortin has several nice ones in VG for under 500. and a pcgs vf20 for 600.
Looks real to me. some corrosion, but for 5$? great deal.
I hiked around Wales years ago and St. David's was one of my favorite places. The cathedral is made of a purplish stone that is really eye...
Those are really poor quality fakes. I completely agree with Santinidollar.
very pretty ms62 dime, Mike!
I would say, as always, it depends on the coin. Just as with OGHs and NGC fattys, many of the best coins in the SMHs have been cracked and...
OK eddiespin, I'll lay low for a while, and just when you're getting complacent.... LOL
Separate names with a comma.
