No, it has nothing to do with comparing the coin to images on the TPG sites. It's that the TPG's themselves make mistakes in their attributions....
Because silver doesn't normally tone like that. Any experienced collector would reject that coin in about 2 seconds for the reasons Beefer said....
Well, the coin collecting world made many mistakes back in the day. Owners of incorrectly attributed coins are the "bag holders" in the end....
Damaged, it's quite common to find coin devices damaged in strange ways. Example: [ATTACH] [ATTACH] The odd thing about this damage, it's known...
1968D is die deterioration doubling. Example: [ATTACH]
Not market acceptable toning IMO.
1991 [ATTACH] [ATTACH] PL
Fun ahead! Thanks Mr.Bank! [ATTACH]
Denver wood from the same year. This coin is silver under the brown patina - that's what caught my eye (searching). You can see it in certain...
Toned CUD: [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
1973 wood? [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
You need to show both sides and crop your pictures to just the coin like this:[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Very brassy 1990 (left): [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
That thing is absolutely hammered for the issue! NICE! Edit - Oh, I see that is the sample image on PCGS! Great honor!...
Whoa....that is SUPER cool. Love that coin!
Stunner! Great job with the pics too. Proofs are tough to shoot.
lololol
That is the most easily excused fingerprint coin that I've ever seen! BEAUTIFUL!
GREAT deal for $45!!!!!! Smart buy you made there!
Separate names with a comma.
