Must be a tough coin to photograph! The last in-slab picture is probably your best one because the lighting. Your other pictures gave me the idea...
62BN
Large date...keep dreaming! Notice how different the small date looks from your coin: [ATTACH]
Yeah, but with my luck it'd come back in a 67 holder! LOLOL
What do you think mine would grade? It has really strong, bright cartwheel luster and a great strike. Pictures shot through an Airtite so ignore...
Me too...and, ALWAYS show the reverse. :)
I like it as a 63. Beautiful and amazing coin!
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
AU-58? [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Nope, just prefer 58's - especially toners. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Here's one of my 1960D small dates, I have not even sent this one in and it's real nice with it's obverse "red" toning: [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Welcome to CT! You found a nice 60-D small date. The Denver issues are NOT more valuable like the 1960P small date. There were approximately equal...
Yup, that's kind of how I call it too....but I want a 58!
The pictures above is how it looks in hand. It looks nothing like these pictures....but..... if you angle the camera and light, there are signs of...
I'll trade you even! :p Never sent this one in for fear of a possible MS-63 grade, I'd rather see it in an AU-58 holder - where I personally...
64? Harsh grade! That's a beautiful example!!
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
There is no alloy issue. What you're seeing is simply the result of poor storage. I've opened a few hundred improperly stored rolls and they...
Separate names with a comma.
