The OP coin doesn't seem to be an error. It could be ED, it could be toning. It could have been in the ground and exposed to pollutants and other...
The weight seems to be correct on the missing clad layer. The missing clad layer and broadstrike should both have good value. The MAD seems large...
Wow that is nice. Why did they mint over it? They must have blank planchets. Was it tossed in intentionally like some of the US mint "errors"?...
Need clear photos. Don't even post these Bigfoot photos. I would love to see a 1981 struck over a 1956.
The second photo looks like the side that we see.
A gram of 10K gold is worth the same as 1 oz of silver (currently.)
I didn't even know there were 1964 SMS coins, but 65-67 when no proof coins were made. Even if it was an SMS, once it is out of the holder, I...
It's almost a spender. 10 cent face value. It may be a "keeper" because it is an error, although minor. With grease errors (and most things)...
The reverse may be VG 10 for OTHER coins, but this coin is graded on a curve. (While I don't agree, I think all coins should be graded the same.)...
If we take the obv VG-10 and the reverse at least VF-15, then the combined grade should come back F-12.
This is the first and only gold coin that I have. Grandma Dorothy gave it to me many years ago. (40-45?) There is a story that goes along with it...
All things being equal it might be G-04/G-06. However, there were issues with this and difficult to find ones with good details. This is taken...
Yes. The mushiness on both sides and the loop in the R in Pluribus. It should weigh heavy. This is the "real" deal.
There are a number of "better" dates that may be difficult. 1934-D 1935-D 1935-S 1936-D 1936-S 1937-S 1938-S 1939-D 1939-S 1940-D 1940-S 1946-D...
Separate names with a comma.
