two different animals entirely, tho, Kurt. In 1986, you could buy a Silver Eagle for about $6
The way that I always understood it is the same except that luster is part of the technical grade where toning is not
They are indented
Thanks everyone. I was really disappointed to see the damage on this coin.
38-D
DISCLAIMER: No dogs were harmed in the discussion in this thread.
I kind of thought so, but the coin is a better date and for the money would have been a steal
I recently cam across this Walking Liberty Half and it has, what looks to be run damage. Since I am not familiar with cuds, rim strike-throughs,...
hard pass...
no. It was only available in this set and the congratulations set which quickly sold out earlier this year.
totally agreed. I am talking worst case scenario when I mention melt in the same sentence as these.
don't be so quick to say this. Long term means long term. It is possible that, like some other series, in time, interest may wane. If interest...
certainly a smart plan. I just don't know if the market in the future will support a price on this coin of not only approx 8x melt, but of twice...
I've heard this tune and played this game before. I see this as more of a flip and run opportunity. I don't know and can't begin to predict...
have you weighed the advantages / costs of certification vs the value of the coins once certified?
At $135, I'll pass
I agree whole heartedly! No logic, no mirrors, no luster!
Only one problem with your plan. The silver eagle from the LESPS is an S-mint coin, the regular proof SAE is a W-mint coin.
can I come too?
I like the sneeze theory, but what Doug says is also quite likely
Separate names with a comma.
