I agree it looks cleaned. The MM does not look like one I saw on coinfacts, but I have not studied the issue that closely.
NIce halves. The 1837 is outstanding, imo
Sorry I inadvertently posted a draped bust half on a capped bust thread. To make amends: [IMG] [IMG][IMG][IMG]
my opinion, before I saw the reveal was gem 45
Nice & wholesome! An album full of coins like that would be a pleasure to view. and since you asked, [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Yikes! very clever.
I have a couple of high quality fakes with the correct weight, not magnetic, will need to get them tested somewhere.
I'm at 55, but don't think 58 is out of the question either. Lovely coin!
64? some marks on the face and eagle but not too bad and pretty clean fields and "cakey" luster.
I forgot to ask the seller if he had checked the weight too.
Nice! would look great in an album. I have a hard time NOT buying coins that look like that.
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
found another fake 1873-CC on eBay. I sent the seller a polite message explaining why I knew it was fake. He quickly removed the listing, but...
People are always finding unexploded ordnance around Richmond. A few years back a fellow who was known for deactivating them was given a large...
Nice! Really like those quarters.
I don't collect Morgans or study them closely. I am interested in learning something from this thread. Several experienced members were certain...
Nice group, Kanga. The Barber looks really good for a 63.
It looks like the "very long claws" variety in the Briggs book, so a specialist might pay a premiium. Looks AU 55 ish to me, kind of washed out...
I'm guessing 55, minimal wear but I always have trouble guessing luster with toned coins. looks great!
I would say that the 1875-P gold Trade Dollar is possibly unique. Seriously, I am sorry this happened. That's a lot of coins with considerable...
Separate names with a comma.
