65.
+1. Not really going to hurt the value. If it's just going in a 7070 as a representation why not? Shine that puppy up.
+1 That is indeed what it is. Nice find, but not really worth much. You might get a buck or two for it as there are those out there who collect...
Ebay doesn't charge you THAT much to sell things. What year is this IH?
In my opinion that's way too much of an increase. Of course I find the whole idea of a service that tells you if they agree or disagree with the...
55.
This coin would have to be examined in hand to make a determination. Could be, but could be die-shift doubling as well.
Looks like it could be a clip, but since they are easily faked we would have to see much better images to determine for sure. If it is a clip...
EyeEat is aways here with these grades...come on brother!
Honestly, only a handful of geeks like ourselves even know that those small letters on coins represent the designers intitials, much less who the...
No. Pure acetone would leave no trace. Why did the dealer wipe acetone on it when you bought it?
Coneca lists one, but it's a class VI which would just mean extra thickness on the date. What are you seeing?...
What's going on at the base of the 0 in the date?
Sweet find Kanga!
Alright. I'm going to say- 61 on the Morg 65 on the Buff 67 on the Merc
Given these three coins, I should would like to know if them holders be green labels!
If a coin is only as good as its worst side, then I have to say 65. Hard to tell with the reflection, but I think 5FS.
That coin looks all kinds of wrong to me. I don't like the overall look, I don't like the 3, I don't like the mint mark and the reverse is just...
I think you'll definitely have to take it out of the holder for anyone to accurately assess the grade.
Gotta go with 66 then. Those marks honestly look like enough to hold it to a 65 IMO, but I'll say 66.
Separate names with a comma.
