If a VAM4, then those clash marks should be seen way more easily. That’s why I think these pics are hiding some imperfections.
I’ll buy a coin in all 4. But I have learned to look past the holder and buy the coin. You planning on selling it? If not.... why spend any...
The huge hit under her ear immediately crosses out 65. I really cant tell from those pics for 62,63,64. But I am thinking 62 tops.
AU(55) details
Somewhere between $75-$100.
Pretty original skin and luster. Looks like the reverse had a rough life. 63 obverse with a 62/61 reverse. :)
Certainly looks like VAM4. I’ll go with 64 because of her neck.
[ATTACH]
Insert them here as fullsize rather than the thumbnail. I think the phone camera is doing some sort of autocorrection/filter or something causing...
I’d prefer perpendicular to the camera and not angled. nice coin!
1887 MS63??!! Even with the CAC that is like a $60 coin. Damn these guys.
A wonderful 63.
You too, huh? I’ve slipped that question into this thread and the 1956 proof set thread where I also posted this coin. I cant get any feedback...
Cool. I have never seen one.
Yeah, I kept running into those. That’s one expensive extra feather.
1957? lol. Naw, no interest in that. Would actually like to do this with one of SMS years.
All NGC Star that is. I learned a ton building my 1955-1950 proof sets. All of those coins came from graded slabs. Most of the early 50s are...
I’m gonna go with MS63. But I am not confident in my answer.
Separate names with a comma.
