Been a long time in the making. My set is the classic 97, plus 9. Those extra 9 are: 78 Reverse of 79 79 CC Capped Die 79 S Reverse of 78 80...
Love that silky skin. 65
I pretty much agree with all that. I generally dislike the look of Morgans in that XF range, and will be on ultra eye appeal mode in the AU...
Oh I understand your position and you have respectfully explained it very well. I just have not reached the same conclusion (at least not yet...
I think balls and strikes should be called the same for all coins in a series, even if some years/mm produced amazing coins and other years/mm...
If the grade should be the grade, then why is the 80 S graded harder?
My daughter, first time with no saddle [ATTACH]
I agree, but I dont think Santini would show us a details coin. Right or wrong, I have seen PCGS and NGC overlook what I consider obvious...
Just enough original luster remaining on the periphery to squeak in a AU50
XF45
63PL
64PL Solid hammer strike. Incredible luster with contrast. Unfortunate ding under her chin.
Title says it all. This is the exact coin. Dripping with frosty mist luster. Accurately graded imo. Obviously not expecting the current PCGS...
What would be the point of cheating?
2
I think that’s definitely wear across her breast. Going with AU58/55. Very pretty.
I agree with everything you are saying. And although I think you’re correct, I also think it’s silly. That coin shouldn’t be held to a different...
Exact reason why I picked this one up. I have studied every detail of this coin…. It’s no 64: [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
On the the real photo, is a fingerprint causing those lines across her face?
There is a small hit on her nose and the bottom of her cap. Maybe dead center of Eagle’s breast. Is that enough to keep it from a 67?
Separate names with a comma.
