Their pictures are so juiced that it falls into the category of “insanely ridiculous”. But they always have a ton of bidders at extremely high...
AU58
Can I call 1950-1955 proof sets that came in a box a type set? Lol [ATTACH] [ATTACH] And an extra [ATTACH]
Here’s mine. Her twin for a comparison. I tend to look for them with this kinda look. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I’ll go with 12A. Looks like an Alligator Eye and nice clashing. really pretty. 65+
Wow, she is near flawless. Very deserving of 67 or 67+. But I will say 66+ is on the holder.
It’s a nice clash. It also easily seen in front of her lips.
Yikes, look at that poor shield.
This common date 1886 (with some sweet clashing) in a Rattler….. is shockingly clean to me. Zero chance this is MS63 [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Do you have an area you think they are seeing as cleaned?
Wow. What a beauty. I’ll go with 66+. Could easily be 67.
Love an honest, well worn Morgan with this look: [ATTACH]
Die Chip? Vam28? She’s beautiful. Picks show a PL obverse. 65 or 66.
Well, that’s I thought at first too. But my eyes are playing tricks on me: [ATTACH] vs [ATTACH]
Key for the series: [IMG]
It might also have a nasty rim ding under the first 8. Hard to say for certain
I’d say MS62 at best. Looks like VAM3 http://ec2-13-58-222-16.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com/wiki/1885-CC_VAM-3
Here is mine for a comparison: [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Very cool. AU58
Very clean. MS66
Separate names with a comma.
