The mint never sealed the brown envelopes. They were shipped unsealed inside a larger envelope of small box. Buying so called unsearched proof...
Sorry, yours isn't a proof. Proof for 1970 were minted in San Franscisco. It would have to be a 1970-S.
There are also Proof Lincoln's that tone a little on the silver side. I have no idea how or why it happens. [img] [img] [img]
Wow!! That is the real deal. How did you find it? Just in AU that's a $20k-$30k coin.
Doubled squeeze was tongue in cheek. Your perfectly associated term, Class 9 DD's, is anything but perfect if there aren't 2 separate images....
This type error or anomaly needs to have its own term associated with it. When I see the term doubled die or coins described by that term, I...
[IMG]
I think these are on proofs, but because of the cameo finish they are difficult to see. [img] [img]
I agree. It's well worth the money to me.
I think the interest in girls will come without much prodding from you. :) Yes, that is quite a bargain for 10 sets of 1936 proofs. You should...
Oh, I see what you're looking at. It is a PCGS database error. It is RB. I sent 11 coins to PCGS for TrueView only. I bought these already graded...
I'm not sure. I have a PCGS MS65BN that isn't nearly as nice. What grade do you think it should be?
[img]
None of the proof sets I bought directly from the mint from 1960-1964 were sealed in the envelopes.
See if they are attracted to a magnet. As kids, my brother and I scrubbed a couple of steelies with a brush and some type of coin cleaner....
Yes, at the bottom of this thread. http://forums.collectors.com/messageview.cfm?catid=26&threadid=917524
According to Fred Weinberg, who is the co-author of 100 Greatest U.S. Mint Error Coins" and "Error Coin Encyclopedia", Vols., III & IV as well as...
You are correct, I said it backwards.:muted:
I think the arabic numerals were used only for the high relief and ultra high relief coins.
Separate names with a comma.
