Ms 66
Touché, I would have never guess that, that many planchet marks could be present, even as weakly struck as the reverse is. Guess I need to sharpen...
https://www.ngccoin.com/news/article/506/
MS 64 RB
XF 45 details Au 50
I am gonna say MS 64, I am not to sure what they thought about the dings across the steps. The obv seems to be struck well.
I am going of MM placement alone for this RPM. I think I see the doubling at the bottom. Wrpm-007 and MS66
That's a whizzing.
Wow, on the Seated Half.
You think it might be a nether stage of -005
If I had to choose between an unlisted die variety and a coin that has a replicate or, two. I would go with the replica, if markers line up there...
Still Kickin.
The Example was not dropped! in the obv. photo, swear it says 2010.
Sorry, to say the "as you say" recessed areas across the nose and eye are exactly that. Very well placed bag marks, Thanks for the great pics!...
Thank you. Thank you!! :)
64+ 65
So, I have run across a couple sets of Lincolns starting 1909, to 96 They have all the key dates, except the 09'S VDB. Most of the early coins are...
I'd have never noticed that as a gouge in the coin. It looked raised to me. http://www.error-ref.com/?s=dropped+element
That is a mint set. The proof sets came in hard cases, and look like this. http://www.govmint.com/1968-united-states-proof-set.html
The pics are a little to pixelated to tell dings from planchet and strike. If it is as clean as the photos show I could see it in a 66 rpm -002
Separate names with a comma.
