Looks like it to me. Nice going.
It's toned and yes it's normal. The smallest hole in the plastic allows enough air to make a coin tone.
Not sharp enough to be a full band.
In other words, mind your own business. She's a newer member and she's trying to learn. No one twisted your arm for you to respond. Just move on...
Use the standard label. No need to get fancy.
Not a Mint error, just damaged.
It's natural toning but it's not attractive toning. I'm sure this coin was cleaned some time ago.
It's what's left of the rainbow after the sun has set. Nice in my book do to each their own. I like it.
Very nice so be good to the girls at the bank.
Are you saying that you can not see any sign of rainbow toning around and to both sides of the top of the torch? If this is what you call terminal...
Yes it does. The slightest sign of doubling and we have an undiscovered error when it's worthless doubling or NAV.
I could not agree more. The gentleman the OP mentioned was and still is, correct.
I think it's a worn circulated nickel.
Well, yes, it's a 1969-S. No, it's not even close to a Doubled Die.
Have you found one? If do, please post.
That was not stated in the opening post. Thank you for clearing that up.
Looking forward to it. Enjoy the show.
We still haven't seen photos of this suspicious coin. Does it really exist?
My thoughts exactly.
Me too but it shows a different type of rainbow toning than the obverse.
Separate names with a comma.
