A chip would be raised. Since this is below the surface it's considered damaged. Now, if we can get to the obverse issue.....
Another idiot backed his pickup truck into a 7-11 parking lot. They kept their safe in the front window. The clerk was filling the cooler so this...
When I lived in Seattle a man broke a basement window and climbed in. He was trying to rob the bank. He cut his arm on the glass. The door to the...
@paddyman98 is up and struggling for his coffee so he can get to work. I'm retired so I stay where I'm needed, in bed. :)
The 1982 and 1983 Mint sets are not from the US Mint. There are a third party called Krause Publications. The US Mint did not make Mint sets for...
According to my Redbook, yes.
Can you post photos of the sets including the packaging?
I think Clint is correct. The date looks too bold as compared to the rest of the details on the obverse. Everything shows wear but the date.
The eye looks like it took a hit. The doubling is a worn die. Stick with. Sooner or later something will click for you.
Looks plated.
Most collectors do not want these however there are a few that do since they are not supposed to be there. They should be trimmed off. Not sure...
Just a common die crack on a zinc Cent. Nice find but not a CUD. This is a Cud.[ATTACH]
The condition makes this bill a spender.
Since this is the new Innovative coin it's going to be produced in aluminum.
Ms-62
It's a close AM.
Congrats on all those posts. Very nice looking Jefferson and it's a great example of what FS really is.
Some like the large print, others like the binder. Me, I just buy the hardback copy as all of the information is there. As long as it's by R. S....
Start a new thread and post photos of both sides. That way you won't be hijacking a thread and you'll get more responses.
You're welcome
Separate names with a comma.
