Damage to the die or an attempted canceling?
:rolleyes: I missed that area below the S, good catch. This is a reference that I use. Maybe @Ordinary Fool can post his reference.
I would like to see some photos of the query? The topic is interesting, and I would like to see the process, this is not to steal,, info. but only...
I think it is circulation wear with a little strike doubling.
S 65 L 65 E 66 C 64 I am not sure if this coin quite gets a 65, I think that the contacts are a little too distracting. I am at 64 maybe a plus...
A 50 percent sale, your quite the guy.:rolleyes:
WWho-001 is a doubled working hub obverse, WDDO-002 Thru WDDO-010 are all obverse. These don't fit the OP's question. I did see that Wexler has a...
Yes, it is possible, I think Chris is right. There is also evidence of die deterioration on the date.
Good conclusion, I think it is what Treashunt says, MD or mechanical doubling,. It doesn't look like either Doubled Die posted above.
There are two for the year, which do you think it is? http://varietyvista.com/01b%20LC%20Doubled%20Dies%20Vol%202/1983PDDR001.htm...
13 minutes.
Is it impossible to post a photo lately, that is oriented correctly?
I'd keep em. Nice finds!
It looks like strike doubling.
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
So, I bought it. And the forgers, used a VAM3a for the coin, I don't think that they fully copied the die, but, it was fashioned after it, this...
The thing is he knows I want to add a nice piece, to my collection. The shop has a lot of damaged goods, except for these, and he knows it.
An 81S MS63 no chance at PL for 190, that's just one, the others, they carry a little of a toning premium, but not worth what he is asking.
I have had a few in my sights, but the dealer wont let up on his premium, they have been sitting there for almost a decade.
Separate names with a comma.
