[ATTACH]
I'd say that's reason enough to buy them. ( You like them ) But relatively common, worn coins seem to always stick close to their silver value.
64 then, 65 today
Great coin, if it is a 70cc quarter. Try taking pictures out of the holder.
Right on, I was going to say the same thing.
A little better date coin. .. but doubling? I don't see it.
I find circulated Morgans to have a nice look. I once did a dansco date set, shooting for some of the better date/mm combos. I was thinking you...
64+
Appears to be looking at something distasteful...
The rim just got bumped. This is an issue but the coin looks nice otherwise and the graders apparently felt the coin was worthy of a straight grade.
I'll go PF 64. It does look like a proof, though I have one that looks a lot like a proof but is not graded as such.
I'll guess 65. Barely.
Not sure I'm understanding the question, but if the coins are the correct dates in your holder, they are the wartime alloy.
Gotta find a pre 1965 to get silver....
Nice solid 65.
The 80CC is a pretty good date, there would be collectors interested in even a low grade example....
F12, possibly cleaned.
I see it as mid-AU
I had to look it up. Interesting. The price structure in relation to the various mintages is very interesting too.
62pl
Separate names with a comma.