Looks like a 1934S to me. Probably grades in the Fine range. Yes, a little better date, but not exactly problem free. I hesitate to throw out a...
The fatty's don't have the line in the plastic under the label. I believe the change was made to help shield the coin from the paper label, at any...
+1
Hmm leaving the authenticity question aside we all overshot it. But in the slab the grade looks about right, I'd say.
PCGS, if it has the green label. Otherwise I'd just as soon have the NGC holders.
MS66, nice!
Both very nice, I'm jealous of the Antietam!
Lots of good advice here. On15-16.... Earlier this year I had some extra cash and found a coin that has been on my bucket list for a long time, a...
Plenty of them out there, so look for one you really like. Even some coins that show a smidge of rub have really nice toning, if you are...
I'll concur this Morgan has very likely seen some degree of cleaning, "harsh" seems a bit, well, harsh to me. Maybe I'm missing something.
Is the color accurate?
VF35 IMHO Can't rule out an old cleaning from the pics, but it looks quite nice.
F15 The reverse is better...
To state the obvious, too much luster for a 40. A 45, I could accept....unless some kind of a net grade??
MS65
Not my series, but AU50.
I agree it's already been messed with.
I'll guess it received an MS 63 in spite of light handling. o_O
MS64
Looks really nice to me. Easily a 65, IMO.
Separate names with a comma.
