$867
I'd say pretty close to the actual color.
I agree, both strong VF. The Morgan might be borderline XF, I can't read how much luster is there.
65+. Would be unremarkable but great toning saves it.
MA, I like it!
Star
I'm thinking right in that area myself now....
Anytime, @Lehigh96. :)
So we all overshot it. Did it sell too cheap?
I agree with ddddd's comments, and imho the reverse might pass, but the obverse is QC.
Some of the toning looks really dark. Could it be that ANACS didn't want to "details" it, but did somewhat net grade it?
I'm going to say I see enough marks to indicate a brief circulation. I don't see high point wear but it's hard to say for sure from a photo of a...
MS 64
I think it's maxed out at 65. A clean cheek is very important to get a gem grade on a Morgan.
Ah well, if we had it in hand the opinions would be closer. :cigar: On my phone the surfaces look circulated and absolutely stripped of luster...
AU53
Good read, Thanks!
"Easily a 55 by today's standards"? I won't argue, not my series at all. But I still would think 55 is too high. JMHO.
Well I went 65+ for the same reason. And yes, I know some of these S mints are known to be rare with full strikes. Not my series, but still should...
A 2066? Damaged after it left the mint. No extra value, sorry.
Separate names with a comma.
