@paddyman98
She, vary well may have been, just seeing a difference in the designs. And, that is learning. I am close to putting a full years sets of these...
1st paragraph I actually sat up in my chair. Said, here is a guy that speaks at ANA conventions, I really want to know his opinion. Then, well,...
I believe @mikediamond has a definition for this type of condition. I do wonder though, if it has to do with the striking pressure being out of...
So, what year are the dimes?
The same doubling is seen on in the mint mark. Sorry to say that it is ME. The MM were hand punchedbinto the working die until 89'. If it were hub...
Very pertty, 65*
In this instance the 69 70 70D have a reverse of 68. RDV-002. This design change is mainly attributed by the torch.
The square rims, mirrored surfaces, and lack of planchet flaws kind of give this one away. A very nice looking Nickel. Great Find!
@62
It looks like what Dave said. DDD that also seems to be the case for the MM. You might take it out of the flip and get a clearer photo, to be sure.
It is a proof nickel. Value around 1-5$
It is because of a design change. As asked what year are they?
I don't consider it a flaw, The class would be called attribution 101. If there was a book that defined your definition of a mercenary, it would...
Don't forget that the lines running through the coin are from die polishing. It a beautiful well struck cent to boot.
The cherry pickers guide, can be what ever you want it to be, that is not what it means to me. Variety's are simply no different than your...
The buyers drive the price not the Auctioneers dealers and coin shows, You can find many coins out of your budget, but that doesn't mean that they...
You would have to post some photos.
Just damage
Beautiful coin, I will say a 66 it doesn't seem to have the luster.
Separate names with a comma.
