Too bad I don't buy from photos. There are some interesting coins in there.
64 64 64QC 65 62
The wide AM is on every cent, it's a little confusing, but what you are looking for is the flared G reverse initials, it is a proof reverse....
I am at 65 no PL it is close, just not enough mirror.
65 FBL. I see a lustrous dark coin.
Have you photo'd the die markers?
Good job on the close ups. The upside down photo of the date and MM should have been the dead give away. MM's are hand punched into the die, and...
I think I see Die deterioration doubling. Same look as DDD on nickel. Yours is nickel plated steel.
I Think that there is plenty of luster, just thick toning. I see a lot of nicks and dings, on the reverse fields. MS64
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] Scratch sucks but I bought it for the RPM.
Here are a couple color toned.[ATTACH] [ATTACH][ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I thought I'd post one that fits this thread well. There are three errors involved with this 55S, all of them are die breaks.[ATTACH] [ATTACH]...
Hope it's a good one Richard! And nice steel cent.
There are many Shady Pawn shops around, and just a reminder, most of these shops have employees that only know how to look on ebay, for sold...
Not to mention complete and weak strike issues.
I think the correct term would be incused lettering. These would be raised on the die, therefore any minute MD would not be struck away by a...
Sure does, interesting though.
The marks on her cheek could be slightly superficial (very light contact) I agree with the 65 grade. edit I am sure that there are better...
http://www.error-ref.com/ This is a good reference for mint made errors. http://www.error-ref.com/?s=Cud What you have are interior die breaks.
I have been thinking about a scope for this particular reason. Yes, it is raised from the coin, but it is very faint. the only thing that catches...
Separate names with a comma.
