Depending on the surfaces they may grade somewhere in the middle, for me I grade them on the low side.
It doesn't match the MM position of any that I looked at. It looks like it could possibly be doubled at the bottom but there is also some damage...
I would let it sit some where and grow a skin, might still come back cleaned though. Just looks a little dull.
Please ask as many questions as you need. We love to see coins,as give as much help as possible. Phil
@Tattooscott did you get it weighed?
I got a little time to get some better photos. What a pain, I think I did OK. I still think I could do better with a little more diffusion. This...
All of EPU is doubled, also the eagle. I will play with the camera, might have to go back to a different lens, it did much better for the close up...
Exactly as stated. is there anything struck into the third side? might say englehard or 22k. It's a real term, get over yourself. Thanks @rickmp...
You are right. I looked but for some reason looked over the placement. I will also play with the photos to see if I can get better shots. Wexlers...
HUH. Maybe I need better photos?
I was wondering. The DDR-001 was found by Bill Fivas why doesn't it get a FS number.
I really don't consider these errors. I categorize them under Variety's. But, since there was an error in the die making I guess they are...
If we don't keep the same verbiage, it ends in a [MEDIA]
It says fine Gold. @Tattooscott Is there anything on the third side?
Good call on the private mint.
Dave thanks for the link. I hope they get it worked out, as far as moving all the references over.
If that's both sides it's a fake. They are the same.
It looks pretty good, a little weak in the strike, but a weight and diameter will tell the story.
@eddiespin Glad your still kickin, some of the usual voices haven't been around lately.
Die deterioration starts as soon as each coin is struck, the severity gets amplified after thousands of strikes.. Die deterioration is a worn out...
Separate names with a comma.
