I am wonder how that made it into a slab? AT
The off look is the reason for the color. I don't see enough details to say what it was but I agree with the details holder.
I have a hard time seeing it pass $7500. This grade definitely has more merit than the last.
It is still my opinion that one truly doesn't know what they are looking at until they study mint state specimens.
Interesting thread Ya'll. It surely gives me a little confusion as to my previous beliefs of NT vs AT. As a collector of raw coins I will use this...
And I just got done photo'ing two birds.LOL
It may not flex, with out damaging it further. I would put it away and come back to it when you have learned more. Good luck with that new box!
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Some very lustrous reflective fields.[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
DC one roller Appolo concept. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I would be willing to bet that he is able to do the same with his scope. I am still learning my DSLR program, and have been using it for a couple...
DC non dollar.[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
There are three different levels with proof coinage. PF, Cameo and Deep Cameo. If the devices aren't frosted, or do not hold much if any contrast...
Good photos. It is hard to tell with out the coin in hand.
PCGS has graded 157 at PF69 NGC 292 I would suggest looking at as many PF69's as you can before buying, and it doesn't matter the plastic as long...
I found a good reference posted for this token over on CU by BG about 2/3rds of the way down the page....
You have the coin in hand. Does it look like damage? Or does there happen to be a well placed gas pocket?
It is possible to find correctly graded coins in any slab, as has been said[IMG]
Looks like it is in need of repair for sure.
Is a commemorative a commem? Even if they change denominations?
Separate names with a comma.
