Those photos are to blurry, I think that the line next to the B is damage but a better photo would rule out the possibility of a IIB. MM were hand...
I usually have a strict policy of not posting before a full cup of coffee. Some of what you wrote, went right over my head. That doesn't happen to...
The S mintmark clearly shows small die chips that are die deterioration. Also mistaken for an RPM. And the D missing the center post is another...
Rare Tim? anyone, even the photos fit his style.
NT/MA
The 52S is die deterioration. Same as the 52D the S mintmark was susceptible to die chips within the curves.
The first looks damaged, nothing there. To be sure check the eye lid. The second and third are Mechanical doubling. Always check the MM and see if...
There is a lot to determine when you are looking thru circulated coinage. The 41' looks as if the date has been flattened. While the 43' looks to...
Agreed :rolleyes: gonna have to get clearer photos.
I am with the QC camp. Something tells me it was helped along, Too bad we don't have another photo of the obv.
All damage, spend it.
Received mine today, wish there was a woman around here to put up a tree I'd show a photo. Merry Christmas Ya'll. I will have to talk to the elves...
NT no doubt.
Damage, Actually @young mag just started yesterday and thinks that every coin is an error, when he actually can't see beyond damage.
If you see the same doubling on liberty date and MM it is mechanical doubling. I understand that you think you have found all these errors that...
Test has been initiated. A) To check my environment. Mainly to see if it helped the acceleration. B) To see if the paper insert is what is causing...
I was thinking the same thing. It needs to stay in the holder.:rolleyes:
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Also a 64PL.
64PL I think the reverse makes PL, but the defect keeps it from gem.
Separate names with a comma.
