That's a neat die crack on the obverse.
I thought the same at first and thought that rectangular nails ended somewhere around the 20's but I was wrong also. Rectangular nails stopped in...
Post a photo.
Wow, this is like trying to compare road kill to a side of beef. Not even worth the effort.
Didn't realize that at all. You will have to get better photos of your coin to confirm. @White Ger. Shep. Lover could very well have this one right.
It's a DDO-001 VV
It's an IDB. A clash would be present in the fields.
It's not an error it is Post Mint Damage. Interesting that part of the Monticello is present in the center design.
A 53 would have to be a top pop to be worth the grading fees.
These are linear plating blisters.
If you say so.
That gouge on the reverse 2 somethin and almost 4. Changing my thoughts PMD.
I have never understood this side of the argument, What I have understood lately is that AU has turned into the new 65. What the TPG's are saying...
Yeah the last thing I want to imagine is a guy named Bernie bent over, Thanks for the visual.:hilarious:
[ATTACH] If there was a most desirable Whizzer to add to ones collection it would be an 09SVDB or a 14D no D strong reverse.
Those votes are looking pretty skewed. I'd be more than happy to see that grade than the one I guessed.
Only in the situation that a coin deserves a designation such as PL. It is close to this one but I don't see the MM placement as correct....
Contact marks affect the grade from 60 to 70 on the grading scale. What makes it Au is the disturbed luster.
Yes, that is exactly what we are trying to tell you. Actually, I am the one that can be reasoned with, I might be stuck in my ways, and yet I get...
Interesting, Thanks Barry M
Separate names with a comma.
