Yeah, the 82' is more illusive:)
My favorite.[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
@desertgem I have searched and searched for that one. I was beginning to believe I would only see one in a book.
@bruthajoe So the first photo is the sellers photo. Not yours?
This was my first one.[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
And the reverses?
I am seeing some funky tones or maybe just diffucult to get a clear shot thru the slab. I don't really see any wear. or much for disturbed luster....
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] Sorry for the terrible photos this is OMM-001, FS-511.
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Gold id difficult from photos. I am at 64 maybe gem.
Coin B is the higher grade. IMO I m thinking coin A has had a slight cleaning/ old dip. Coin B just has a more original look.
What does the other side of the coin look like?
Well I guess we will see. That 10" of snow that fell thursday and friday, are almost melted. Maybe? What I won't do is deface and alter a coin...
The kiddo and I ate gonna go out this week, Hit a few places. Just waiting for the snow to melt.
Nice ones Messy, I especially like the 1831 O-109.
Any one every remember Vern? [MEDIA]
Welcome Shortcut, good to have ya.
See how the high points of the pillars are flush with the surfaces of this coin? Your slab photos show the opposite of this, meaning it is...
Separate names with a comma.