The last time I looked at this. There were one found, and hardly a thought that the director gave two way. This feels like a set up. Not very cool...
Your a lucky guy. You have now found two $5 Matte proof Lincolns?
It's a tough one to call for me without seeing the surfaces some areas look damaged but others look MS. I could see a rolled thin planchet or...
25
Fun coin I have had too many Cervesa's but I think I have made up my mind. I will look at it in the morning. My first impression is damage.
Not sure on weather to call it retained or peeling. Nice Lamination!
Exactly, put it away look at another box Coin roll hunting. Then give it a re evaluation. I was thinking a finned rim.
@AnYangMan and @TypeCoin971793
You are gonna have to post better photos than that.
They are saying that this is nearly noncommunicable outside. Keep the hands clean. I meant to take a photo of the BBQ'ed ribs with a tangy sauce....
[ATTACH] Happy Birthday Ron.
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
How did I know you would chime in on this one, Thanks @physics-fan3.14
You can't deny that in this case the reverse letters are the main factor in the attribution. This is a damaged coin every way you look at it.
I am serious it looks like a 1945.
Why would you even try? Might as well pull out the 45 and put it out of it's misery.
I doubt that it is a lamination. Seems like it could be a die chip though. These photos really don't help.
@cpm9ball Makes you wonder, Yet, I can't imagine that Fivas and Stanton could fit every die variety in the book. Therewould probably be 3 books...
Same here. Filled die on the 80 something. But the last one is altered after it left the mint.
It is in the 6th edition cross reference. I forgot the cross reference was there. [ATTACH]
Separate names with a comma.
