I had a buzz last night didn't mean to insult you. The designation of 62 on this coin either means that the luster was dipped away., or it has...
You see how he quoted you instead of me? By the way, Classic responce that was funny.
No doubt acetone, xylene. Nothing has even touched the surfaces. The coins are forever damaged. I have only hoped that they would tone over....
That is very interesting. I am afraid that it is die deterioration. Photos can be decieving.
Rascal lives for controversy., why do you appologise?
The last thing this coin needs is anorher dip. It the exact reason it is so easy to tell an AU 58 from a MS
Yeah butt!
Funny but I don't want that in my lungs.
The problem is it is not there. (MS) Not kickin @Santinidollar it is a beautiful coin. If you cant see evidence of rub in spite of your own...
The stem has a form of die deterioration. Not doubling.
Tis true, yet a sudden shift in temperature and humidity? Aka a thunderstorm, down pour. Etc.
MD can happen anywhere on the coin. But I agree this is not an RPM.
I am going with wear, slight but "circulated" AU58
They aren't nearly as significant as the OP. I will try later if he wants me to post them. @MCPark82
So, am I right? have you seen this look before? I would imagine that the sets would also tend to sweat some. and the reason that the damage is...
I have a few from Denver that have some good sized IDB's on the oak leaves.
I think the placement is correct. I would lean closer to a mid die state than an early die state.
Grease filled or weak strike. I am at MS62.
In my opinion I would guess that the sets were exposed to extreme heat. Causing them to sweat. I am not really positive that is the reason....
I am at 58, depending on when it was graded it could be in a 62 slab.
Separate names with a comma.
