Here are some references for you. Bookmark them. VV is an in depth reference to just about every modern doubled die and variety....
I sure do wonder what @Jack D. Young @Conder101 @Marshall think of this. And what are the characteristics on the obverse that make it unique...
If you inherited a 55 Doubled Die don't you think that you would check the little box that says attribution? Just saying. The Tpg's are interested...
Toning is not a mint error. In fact most would call it environmental damage. Coins begin toning the moment they are struck, no matter how...
At MS66 they are auctioning at $700 and above. MS67 no less than $2000.
Not unless you pay to have it attributed.
After @Rick Stachowski incredible photos. I see the notching and some separation in the devices. Nice find @Steve333 .
Add in the wear on the leg, no hand, robe and breast.
That's always one way to prove a point, yet we have new to collecting folks all the time come here thinking that the have a new discovery. Which...
Both look nice Chief. I am a fan of pastel toning!
No, I don't see any doubling. Because when a coin gets circulated to the point that yours is. The contact and circulation destroys the doubling...
That's a well worn and circulated 70 quarter. Nothing out of the ordinary.
Wow, what a waste of time and money, correction unless it is towards an education. Yet, we do that for free around here. Please post the results.
Lol
*2
Wear and tear but also over used and grease filled dies. Still not an error.
If that is not glue. Which it does have the possibility. It is a retained cud. The crack crosses the rim at each end. 3 and 7 o clock
Proof coins are struck twice. Although it does have the look of a DDR.
There is always a possibility. The problem is that the mm does not have any chatacteristics of being as struck. When a coin shows circulation and...
It is damaged PMD. Could be altered, it did not happen at the mint.
Separate names with a comma.
