Guess the grade and the slab. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
That is die deterioration.
Sorry, but I don't see it either. The doubling is flat like as said above. I don't see the notching on the devices either.
These photos are useless. They are blurry, and too small.
Here is mine a centered broadstrike. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
+1
Cool wide second punch on the 9. This has got to be a PF65 or better. Nice one Jags.
Now, how do these turn so much in a four finger holder. I can see the old rattlers, But NGC should re holder that for free.
Well you can't prove something that is impossible. It's an expensive education. At least it's not my money.
I do agree, that the obverse is amazing. We are just gonna have to wait and see what grade it comes back. Hopefully the photos are just over...
I am at MS66. Star? Even with the dark area upper rim reverse?
I have more fun running the stretch between road and side walk around town here.
I am thinking a 53.
LOL, Yeah I kind of felt like that yesterday. Remodeling, you never know if your gonna open a can of worms. Yesterday was one of them.
I believe it is this one. http://www.maddieclashes.com/tdc-1c-1999-02/
Cool clash on a modern zlincoln .:cool:
I agree it is a pain to shoot. To get the surface details the coin ends up being too dark.
Is that the Dutch rock band?
The lines in the wheat stalks seem to still have full separation. I am in the VF camp.
There are a few bag marks on the coin, but not in focal areas. Though crusty and dark. There is plenty of luster on this one to make the 66 grade...
Separate names with a comma.
