No.
One is just slightly worn which would not reduce the weight much, the other has extensive corrosion that would reduce the weight.
Badly corroded, this would account for the weight loss.
It is corroded, that can account for a lot of lost weight.
Definitely heat damage, seen it many times. Not necessarily any discoloration, depends on the heat source. It could also have worn down...
The 2006 is just worn down, probably intentionally. The 2013 has been damaged by heat causing the layers to bubble and separate.
Sorry to say it is just damaged, it looks like another coin was hammered or squeezed into it. Welcome to the forum though.
They must have seen a problem, pvc, some crud or something that they thought could be fixed.
I think you better just send the coin in, we're not getting anywhere here.
Take your own advice, buy some guides on coins or send it in to one of the third party graders.
What they are saying is that an overdate would be over an earlier date, not a later one.
Can you imagine if everyone took his advice and sent every scratched, bent, gouged, stained, counterstamped, glued, painted, drilled, hit with a...
While it is nice for it's age it would still only be worth face value in my opinion. It would have to be much nicer to warrant any premium.
The only good advice in here is to buy books on whatever area of numismatics you are interested in.
The Etsy listings have no basis in reality whatsoever. Yours is a normal 1969 s cent.
Welcome to the forum. I have to say though I am a bit confused. What do you feel is special about your coin? That is the normal weight for a...
Welcome to the forum. If you can post clear pictures of some of your coins you will surely get some honest answers here. The most likely...
Guaranteed this never happened. When errors are discovered they are destroyed, plain and simple.
I see what you feel is a 4, but it is just a random mark that resembles the top of a 4. It isn't even the same size as the digits in the date.
Yes, you are correct.
Separate names with a comma.
