The 2002-D looks like environmental damage. It could also be from acid so it's PMD or post mint damage. The 1947-D was minted in Denver so not a...
We survived! You and I are living proof!
Just a form of plastic that is safe for coins.
You paid less than I did.
No but it is MD.
It worth it. Keep as is and be happy.
The obverse is a lamination error with west but given the date I'd take that as normal. The reverse looks like Damage with wear.
Looks like some hits in that area so PMD. It's a spender. Have a nice night at work. I'm off to bed. A long busy day.
MS-63
Definitely!
I agree but at $5.00 I didn't care.
I would have asked if she wanted to round down.
Missed it by 1 and a star. I was lower.
It's normal and only worth face value. Welcome to CT.
Not at it's current price.
They are worth exactly one cent each. What you see is normal for copper coated Zinc Cents. The 1983 is mechanical doubling and the 1988, we'll you...
Not a proof. Not a high relief. But it has been polished and it's a very common date. Only worth melt value.
I have at least one thousand one dollar star notes. Some ask why? I kustvtell them that its only a dollar and setting them aside, well who's going...
That is a great piece of history and a wonderful note to have. No corners are missing and no tape. Wonderful.
Take 2 aspirin and text me in the morning. :smuggrin:
Separate names with a comma.
