The last coin posted is a close AM.
Very slight misaligned die on the 1989 D, but not enough to matter. The 1986 is from a later die state but nothing unusual.
Oh well, I did it anyway! It is a Miller 4.4-C which is a rarity 3 variety, 201-500 known.
I really don't understand your question, but both cents just have normal zinc cent problems. Bubbles and corrosion.
Are you sure it isn't an F? If so that is the designer's initial.
Nice! Going to try to ID the variety?
There is no way to say how it got damaged, but it certainly didn't happen at the mint. Just extremely beat up.
Pictures aren't too bad. Not seeing anything out of the ordinary though.
Do you have a specific question about the coin? Help, doesn't say much.
I see two very normal cents, can you point out exactly what you are seeing?
I wondered if anyone would catch that.:)
I make all kinds of mistakes, but if a post is just unreadable due to no punctuation or poor spelling I just pass it by.
That is ensure, not insure! Sorry, I couldn't resist!;)
Counterfeit is counterfeit, I don't think 30 days would matter. It's not like you just weren't happy with it. I'd really push it.
My wreath cent is like that. I went with smooth, well worn for the chain. My wreath is probably VG details corroded, but it has a strong date.
Slight correction. It is 48-g, not 48-G. Maris used both upper and lower case letters to designate the reverse dies, hence reverse G is totally...
That one is a 48-g. Will be interesting to see the results.
Dang, I need to get some way to take pictures. Might be able to get my son to do it in a day or so. Yours has more detail, but mine is smoother...
Maybe we could have a contest to see whose is worse!
It could weigh almost anything, it all depends on how much metal was removed from each coin when someone joined the two together.
Separate names with a comma.
