[ATTACH] [ATTACH] Ok here’s one retail is $30-35 what did I pay
Nice coin. Love that design
Nice. Not straight grade due to the msrk on the back? I’ve seen worse in holders
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Solid 64
Prooofs are soft but that’s a pretty one I’m guessing $1585
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] Don’t think I put this one up in a long time trade dollars are something I have a lot of
63 and $50
Ms 64
Then there’s the ever present resale certificates I think most coin and antique collectors both have a tax number to get out of paying it. They’ll...
[ATTACH]
Yeah I know. It looks uncirculated cause it’s fake. 1880s San Francisco coins are known for being well struck. 1840s and 1850s o mint seated coins...
Interesting it’s not a modern Chinese fake. I still think it’s a cast copy. It’s probably real silver though
81-s 64 And today it’s a 65. Gorgeous cheek and reverse 79-s a 65 78-s 63. Cheek ding hurts it
It’s not the worst I’ve seen. A little conservation and it’s a nice coin
Brand new fake. Noticce it has au/xf details yet it’s supposedly uncirculated. And it’s not a coin known for soft strikes like some of the earlier...
Great read on the Woods Hibernia. It makes perfect sense as they had their weight in copper and circulated. Until basically demonetized
Yeah I didn’t look close my first look. Every time I look more it screams cast fake more
Separate names with a comma.