Unfortunately, both of you are right IMO.
I don't collect bank notes wish I could help. Have these notes been de monetized?
I would have to go with wat ever Morgan dude says. In the past we have seen many coins that when sealed it heats up the insert and sometimes it...
Although the coin has descent luster. It is not enough to put it in the gem or premium Gem category. The gash or staple scratch keeps it from FBL
AU53 I like it!
You can put up a direct link. We do it all the time with questionable coins and counterfeits.
I can't tell. But I will agree with old man winter.
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Thats the soft insert to keep the coin from rattling in the holder.
Neat PL Physics.
I like it Larry. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Cool find Larry, I agree with :rolleyes: I don't see any damage, just circulation and some nice laminations.
Lincoln is definitely looking a little ghostly. Neat find just not worth a premium IMO.
I am in at gem MS65, the luster says 66 or better though. So are you buying this one @Morgandude11 I see a lot of die polishing on the reverse.
Not to mention that the coin has coin roller damage also, tis a good way to move (remove) some metal.
I was wondering how they authenticated this. It has to be the right distance between strikes. Is that right @alurid How many striking chambers did...
Have to go back to the way Back machine for that one Huh @Paddy54 Earlier I wasn't having trouble with the marriage. I was cooking breakfast. lol...
As a detecting point of view, I agree. Have also had that natural look disappear with just a soak in water.
Maybe a dropped element? Is it recessed or raised on the coin?
I see a new look, I have always liked the white background in a slab. It has an elementary feel.
Separate names with a comma.
