Looks like a lamination error. The main thing you first see is the detached area but look above Lincoln’s hairline. That’s an attached lamination....
My thoughts as well. A kid pulled them from dads collection.?
In all honesty they are damaged. Best to spend them. :)
Definitely a lamination but a very small one. Small is better than none.
My thought is that despite being a decent coin, it’s a shame someone had to damage it.
I have one but that is sure a nice one to find in circulation. Congratulations
Thank you.
AE Tetarteron, 4.6g, 20 mm, 6h; Thessalonica mint. Obv. Q?E to left, ??IOC to right of bust facing of St. George, I bearded, numbats, wearing...
Yes Frank. I’m suffering from a complete failure as to how this would be a D mint mark under the date. It’s a 1969 coin and that was over 50 years...
And what did I say on Friday? She’ll get it, late but she’ll get it. Be patient. Glad it’s out for delivery. Hopefully the carrier delivers it to...
Before or after the strike?
I know it’s blurry but it’s not a RADAR.
Yes it’s a keeper! Very interesting and quite different. Looks like a sharks tooth.
It’s a spender as it’s not a fancy number of any sort.
I can’t say what it is as I have no idea. It looks as if it was in the metal and just a good strike to be included in the coin. Definitely a...
Definitely a bank tellers stamp. Damaged
All the details don’t look as sharp as they should.
Very nice. I have one somewhere.
I voted for the top ? in your poll. Not sure why but it was there. It’s a normal coin so spend it.
I’m with the roller marks. Improper alloys then to be not so straight and uniform.
Separate names with a comma.
