Looks like good ol' die wear to me.
Cool TDO find!
I agree. Nice off-center, but not a doubled die obverse/reverse/trails.
Wait...that link leads me to a new thread, and in that new thread is a link to this thread. We're going around in circles! edit: did not realize...
The third picture down shows the doubling best. I can see the splits you are referring to, so I would say yes, you have a doubled die. Congrats on...
First off, the pictures are too far away for me to tell you what exactly the anomaly in question is. That being said, I can tell you 100% that it...
If you have questions regarding lincoln cent varieties/errors in particular, I would suggest heading over to thelincolncentresource.net forum (I...
Machine doubling IMO...sorry.
I agree with the above.
Gotcha. Tricky wordplay! :devil:
I got thrown off with the "you cannot walk down or through this"...I thought you could walk through a hall though? :rollureyes:
Andrew, you should start a new thread instead of using someone elses. You will get more responses that way.
Large date on the 1960-D.
A better website to check would be coppercoins.com...put in the date, mintmark, and variety, and it will give you pictures and markers. Good luck...
Purchased my first large cent the other day, here are the pics (I didn't take them, but they are of the actual coin). I was on a tight budget, so...
The 1970-s is normal, most likely a damaged mintmark. The 1960-D, however, is actually a repunched mintmark variety! This variety occurs when mint...
Could be ex-encased in some pendant, but either way it certainly looks like PMD.
In order for a coin to be a wide AM variety, the spacing between the A and M needs to be the same between the M and E. the spacing on your coin is...
I personally think your coin is damaged. Compare the right leg of the M to the left. Looks like part of it was abraded off, making it look like a WAM.
Nice off-center! I would agree, about 10-12% off center.
Separate names with a comma.
