This is not PMD, rather it is die deterioration doubling that is caused by dies used long past their intended lifespan. Keep up the hunt!
I would agree with the PMD analysis. Keep up the hunt!
Does not look like a doubled die to me. Could be a lighting effect or engraving doubling, which was common in the 60s.
I'm not detecting a grease-filled die anywhere. And MD does not have to show on the op and bottom of the mintmark. It could be isolated MD,and...
Based on the pictures provided, I don't think the OP's coin is a 1941-S "large S".
Yes, there is a premium associated with them. I would guess somewhere in the $20-35 dollar range.
I can't quite tell...are the rims present on the blank side? If they are, it could be a struck through die cap. If they are not there, I would...
I would guess over-abraded die, as there were many clashes in 1983 that needed to be removed. 1969-D is the date to look for for no initials. I...
Looks like the bottom serif of the mintmark has some damage on it. I'm not seeing anything else resembling an RPM. I would suggest you check...
All I am seeing is machine doubling, which is flat and shelf-like. An RPM just that-is a repunched mintmark...it will not be flat like MD is. Keep...
I'm not seeing anything stand out in particular.
I would guess either altered or fake.
Unfortunately, I am not seeing anything that indicates a doubled die. I am seeing some die deterioration doubling on the letters, but otherwise a...
I agree with damage.
Nope, no collectors value unfortunately. Keep up the hunt!
That looks like a rim CUD. There is no extra value associated with it. Keep up the hunt!
I don't see any notches at the bottoms of the D and O. I am seeing more machine doubling.
Yup, a minor struck through grease find. Cool!
The pictures aren't that good, but I can't think of a struck through that would affect both sides like that. It des not have the appearance of a...
I would think some form of post-mint damage would be the culprit.
Separate names with a comma.
