Except for the "typical" die clashes that maddieclashes lists, perhaps? :rolleyes:
I'm not that good identifying errors but it looks like a flipover double strike, second strike off-center.
One key point that I will mention is that I am no sure if this is a MAD (misaligned die) clash or a regular one. I can't speak for Mr. Neff, but...
Certainly looks like a die clash. To answer your question about rarity, typical die clashes can range from common to uncommon. It isn't rare, but...
I posted a thread about this error last week. http://www.cointalk.com/t223392/ Keep up the hunt!
It looks like a zincoln from the pictures provided, but I would really like to hear what the weight is.
That specific area of the obverse die fell out, (we call this a die break, and if it is connected to the rim, a CUD) thus creating a cavity in the...
I don't think there is such a thing as a toning "error", as toning is technically a form of environmental weathering (provided it is natural). It...
Looks like about 20% off-center (I think). Despite its condition, a phenomenal find considering it came out of a roll, and the fact that the date...
Shame that people bid on it thinking it is a doubled die. I would say it is incuse/offset die wear.
I guess it is possible, I am just not picking up anything from the pictures (I guess they are too pixelated to even tell). Master die doubling and...
I am not seeing any indications of a doubled die, I'm not even seeing any master die doubling. You should be looking for notching and separation...
The earlobe took a hit. For some reason, this is a common place for damagenon cents. Keep up the hunt!
I'm thinking incuse/offset die wear as well. Keep up the hunt!
Did you weigh it? Normal copper cents from that era are 3.11 grams.
It helps if you tell us what you see in each coin instead of us just plain guessing.
Machine doubling. You want to look for notches and separation lines, not flat and shelf-like doubling. Keep up the hunt!
Your coin is not a doubled die, but rather plating issues that are common on zincolns...seems especially common on 1992 for some reason. Keep up...
I would focus more on the fact that your coin does not show the doubling present on die 4, therefore, it cannot be die 4. Your coin has some...
Because of the presence of heavy die scratches, I would guess the reverse anomalies are the result of die abrasion doubling.
Separate names with a comma.
