I personally would not give that coin an MS-66. In fact I'd have trouble getting higher than MS-64. I wonder if the small slab was from the days...
My experiences with scanning coins show: -- scanners are made for flat items; a coin is not flat (actually someone else on this site said that...
Agreed. Has the look of a cleaned coin with dark toning added in an attempt to cover the evidence.
Gem Proof!? I'd say anything PF-68 and up qualify for that label. BIG difference in value.
I agree PLUS Did you take a look at the seller's feedback?
Here's mine. Actually it's in a tie with a few others but it's the best looking one. [IMG] [IMG]
Which variety is it? With or without designer's initials?
Looks like a GSA dollar. 61/62 And I'm leaning towards 61.
But a LOT more expensive.
I use the Novus 3-part polish/cleaner. Works well (with a bit of elbow grease) except on deep scratches.
Damage after leaving the Mint.
My philosophy: Old age is always 15 years older than I am.
I'll be very interested in seeing the results of an acetone soak. I'm not sure of what's going on.
BTW I hope FT (or FB) on Roosevelt Dimes DOES matter. I've got a full set of silver Roosies (1946-64) all slabbed MS-66 FT (or FB).
Could be. I can't argue the point.
Don't forget, the correct designation for Roosevelt dimes is Full Torch (FT). The term Full Bands (FB) is only used because the TPG's never got...
Similar to the Post Office Dept. They over-saturated the market and stamp collecting took a dive. Still hasn't recovered.
Die chip at the mint mark?
I'm quite happy with my MS-63 Antietam.
I've been working on my Early Commemorative Set probably for about 10 years. And I'm after ALL of them (okay, the 1915 $50 pieces will have to be...
Separate names with a comma.
