I would imagine paying about $20 for this example. Nice find, by the way. Keep up the hunt!
Tough to tell because of the way the lighting is reflecting off the date, but my gut says mechanical doubling. Keep up the hunt!
I punched the serial in and yours doesn't look rare, though it still is cool. Keep up the hunt!
Here's a cool link I bookmarked a while back. Not sure how accurate it is. http://mycurrencycollection.com/reference/stars/lookup
Type II planchet as evidenced by the proto-rims. I bought one in a similar condition on ebay for about $2. Keep up the hunt!
Hope he enjoys the complimentary sandwich transport bag.:devil: Glad that you changed the title/description at least.
Not having a mintmark means it was minted in Philadelphia. It is most likely underweight due to environmental factors such as corrosion. It is...
I hope whoever bought it did't pay more than a buck for it, and knew that it was machine doubling and not a DDO or an RPM. If a repunched...
Now I'm frightened. :rolling:
A filled die would be a "struck through" error where part of the detail of the design is missing. What you have is PMD...a coin damaged outside...
I would not sell an individual circulated wheat cent on ebay if it were a common date. Not worth going through the hassle for such a low value...
You didn't get rick rolled, you just didn't understand what a winky face means...
Some of those are EXTREME!
Mintmark appears to be MMS-002, so I do not think it is a 1909-s. My guess would be 1919-S. the VDB initials would be located on the shoulder,...
It isn't an RPM. Maybe if you posted 5 more pics of the same area I would change my mind.;)
Could be a minor struck through, probably not much of an added premium, although it is cool. Keep up the hunt!
The mint changed the composition of the cent in 1982. Instead of being 95% copper and 5% zinc, the cents are now 97.5% zinc with a 2.5% copper...
That looks like the same coin. If it were an RPM, I probably would have seen it in the other pictures and noted it. Unfortunately, I don't think...
That is a plating issue and not an RPM. Worth face value. Keep up the hunt!
Is the arrow in the photo pointing to the supposed RPM? I am not seeing it. The coin looks like MMS-011...is the date 1985-1989? Keep in mind that...
Separate names with a comma.