Yes, obviously I agree. I think the key is in the hair on the obverse with very few reverse differences.
LOL, well I put it back to NGC. What I don't like is that it is not searchable. HOWEVER, the other "Ley" varieties or errors are listed. I don't...
Yea, they are not beauties and that is for sure. Some are quite scarce in top condition and underrated is the 1894. I have an AU58 that looks...
OK, I confess that I think I know the difference but don't like as you've gathered the "VIP" term or the price differential.
I have wrestled with this topic for many years and confess to not having the answer & largely given up. However, the topic was brought to the fore...
Probably not too much different depending on the strength of any one of them as they would be just mild acidic....
Ah, simple is good. Very nice result there!
Will you share your secrets, or is this proprietary? And what is the accretion?
Been trying to get one of the 1969 Biafra 6 pence & not too many around at all, the couple I have seen have been handled & wiped, etc. The actual...
No, not IMHO enough value. Also most collectors like the original packaging including the box and certificate of authenticity (COA) if possible....
Yes, I agree and that is why I tried to state in that way. His are (P) proof and the set appear (U) prooflike uncirculated.
You still have to have connections IMHO. Was the Korean submitter a large dealer by any chance?
The above set posted by Kentucky may be an (U) uncirculated prooflike set as there is a marked lack of cameo, but hard to tell for sure. Packaging...
Separate names with a comma.
