Some nice additions Matt. Latest SC star notes... [IMG] [IMG] [IMG]
A pair of 95 $1 Minneapolis Stars.... [IMG] [IMG]
On some notes, a natural "paper wave" is acceptable, and sometimes even desirerable......that's why is has the PPQ designation.
Photos are not working for me, and I don't want to establish a GMail account to see them.
112 312 712
Simple answer, not much. It's from the 2nd run of 3,200,000 and yours is maybe in XF condition. You obviously have internet access, and if you...
Never a doubt in my mind either Matt. I hope something happens moving forward before it gets to be 2 years without closure.
Welcome to CoinTalk Minesh. I check them here; http://www.uspapermoney.info/groups/f1969bs.txt
Best reason ever.
They were circulating in my SDB along with these 2006's...... [IMG] [IMG]
Are these to current to have any value ? [IMG] [IMG] ....could I call them mini-ladders (012) ?
I do not believe your note would grade that high, (AU55-58). Center fold, left-lower crease, soft corners, and many handling marks. Looks more...
I agree. Not a true repeater, or a short run star. As far as value, not much, if any, above face value in its condition and because of the writing...
Poppin' your cherry on this beautiful example will eventually turn you into a currency trollop.....nice pick up.
These cards are getting addictive..... [IMG]
I agree with lettow.......man made error.
A 1963 $5 LT Star in VF is worth somewhere between $15-$20 at best....Im not sure how much, if any, value would be added because it is a binary....
There are always possibilities for notes of this era to have been washed.......even by the BEP. [IMG]
You are correct.....run #2 (128,000). You can check it out here, http://www.uspapermoney.info/groups/f2006_d.txt
There's a thread called Stack Strappers, or Strip Stickers or something like that for collectors that speak of and display interesting, circulated...
Separate names with a comma.