Correct but it is a tougher to find date.
It’s a common note that’s from the 1957-A series. Worn but in tact. The serial number is on the low side but collectors want a low not below 1000....
First it was minted by a worn die, then it was struck by circulation damage.
Too many bag many for a good grade so just keep and protect it. A very nice V75 and W find in your change.
Shame on you for even thinking of doing so. There’s nothing to be gained and lots to be lost.
Definitely a better date with poor photos, sorry. It has its wear but still a good looking piece. Only 1,557,000 were minted. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
It’s a real copy. :smuggrin::smuggrin:
Not a bullion coin. Both are copies. That’s all that matters. They are novelists.
Just call your credit card company and tell them not to process this charge. If the seller doesn’t get payment, they won’t ship it but you won’t...
It has wear from working in our economy but this is a tougher date and a great buy in junk silver. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
LOL
Please read my post directly above yours. Then come in from the cold, get warm and laugh. :)
I’m not a grader either but it should make a 60 or 61. I consider the 1904-O to be a fairly rare coin in a 64 or above.
Weakly struck, very common on the date and mint mark. It can easily fool you.
I wouldn’t even take a free copy of the NYTimes let alone pay for one.
@Publius2, This is the best I could get. Hope it helps. I thinks it’s easy to see just how rough and porous these were.[ATTACH]
The reverse on this is fairly nice, certainly higher than a 62 but the obverse has too many small marks that bring it down.
NGC graded MS-62 Morgan Silver Dollar. A slightly better date. It’s really nice looking but I think it has a few too many dings to be a grade...
Of course not but I don’t see how anyone could ask about a coin, receive our negative feedback and then do posts like that.
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Separate names with a comma.
