Yep, looks like roller damage.
That coin is a legitimate doubled die. I can see the notching in UNITED.
Could you point to specific examples of coins in PCGS, NGC, or ANACS slabs that have been falsely labeled as varieties?
1) not seeing anything indicating a doubled die 2) looks like something attached to the coin 3) mechanical doubling and die crack
+1.
My opinion is no.
Die clash that was being abraded away by the mint, nice find. :)
Desertgem called it. Your coin shows longacre doubling, which does not command a premium.
With the WAMs, the proof reverse dies were MISTAKENLY used for some striking of the reverse. I highly doubt that a proof reverse doubled die was...
I am not aware of proof dies being used to strike circulation coins, if an expert can give input on this I'd be interested to hear.
Isn't this the same coin that was posted ysterday, and I said misaligned die?
Pretty sure that coin pictured on coppercoins is a proof, and your coin does not appear to be a proof.
The thing about parents, is they usually do what they think is best for you. I wouldn't necessarily say what they did is "messed up". A lot of the...
Vice job as explained above.
I think it looks cool. :)
They probably hid them, unless they actually told you they threw them away.
I can 99% guarantee you that any "unsearched" roll showing a 1909-s on one end is a scam. You'll get that coin and a bunch of junk. I would save...
It was a rare 1969-S doubled die obverse, and was in mint state. http://www.lincolncentresource.com/doubledies/1969Sddo1.html
It's worth what it says on the back.
They are considered errors, not varieties, as they are a malfunction of the die directly. Still a cool find on a more recent coin. :)
Separate names with a comma.
