What you see as doubling of the columns is actually part of the design. I'm not seeing a DDR.
I would agree with mechanical doubling.
No typo unfortunately, here is the quote from the original post... "I paid six hundered and 70 dollars for it"
Oh, spare me the details!
This is why RESEARCHING a coin before you buy it is very, very important...when you don't even know where it's from, that should be a warning sign...
Then maybe I'm missing something...I see a similar coin selling for $2 on ebay...is there a special issue this year that would make it worth $670?...
Rules are rules, and breaking a set of rules is considered violating an agreement. I'm very uneducated regarding the logistics of selling on...
Questionable color, possibly cleaned...I don't think it'll slab. :D
Tough to tell...could you possibly get a closeup of where you are seeing the doubling? Thanks!
So you paid 670 dollars for a coin that you don't even know the origin of? Or am I missing something? Was this an ebay purchase or other?
May I ask what it is? And can we get clearer pics?
Got as part of a trade...sorry, no fancy pics this time around. :) [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I'll give you 10 cents for both...
Expressed a minor interest in coins at around 8 or 9, didn't really get into collecting though until about 3 years ago when I was 16. College will...
Agreed...
I see nothing that indicates a DDO or a DDR on the linked coin.
Appears to possibly be a plating blister, and if it is, that means that it is a one-time occurrence on the coin (meaning you wouldn't find other...
Probably environmental factors. I don't believe that there us a mint error that would result in a blackened appearance of cents.
It's worth whatever someone is willing to pay for it. Unfortunately, errors like this often don't command a significant premium, unless they are...
Definitely mechanical doubling. 1967-1972 had A LOT of it. Yours is cool as it shows on both sides of the coin.
Separate names with a comma.
