The doubling cuts into the design. Mechanical doubling, not a DDO.
I understand that, Rick, but keep in mind that coppercoins no longer recognizes die 2 as a doubled die. The listing is only there for educational...
Rick...a worn die NEVER refers to a doubled die. The two terms are not interchangeable. There is not a single source you will find where die wear...
No...worn die means die deterioration doubling. Not a doubled die. Die deterioration doubling: also known as die wear, or die fatigue....
Nice work, Jody. The doubling is clear as day in those photos. Well done.
Hmmm...are you sure it just isn't the large date variety for 1974? Coppercoins even says in the description for die 2 Meaning that it isn't a...
The "D" is so big that it wouldn't match up to any part of the design. It is damage.
Thanks for the info, I'll try to work on shooting a little differently.
It is damaged and there is no S mintmark.
Your coin has mechanical doubling. It is not a doubled die. Keep up the hunt!
From what I see, the coin looks heavily cleaned...
Looks like a normal small date. The nose could either be re-engraving or mechanical doubling.
Got this as part of a trade with user mainebill. A very nice 1835 Half cent to replace my previous one for my date set. Anyone feel like venturing...
I am just stating my opinion based on experience and seeing these coins go up for sale. Don't take my opinion as "trying to give this error a hard...
If you want to get technical, yes, I suppose it would be considered an "error", though it has nothing to do with the die, and more with the...
It is a plating issue with the coin, not a rare die error of any kind. Keep up the hunt!
Yes I would, if you are interested, you can PM me.
I think your coin is just damaged...
1992P close AM cents are the very very rare ones, going for tens of thousands of dollars, with the 1992D cents (what you have) being found more...
Yes, the I has been damaged. Keep up the hunt!
Separate names with a comma.
