Your coin shows mechanical doubling.
If I understand Mike's comment correctly, he is saying that another coin contacted this coin after being struck, meaning that it is damage and not...
Do you see the notching, specificlly on the leg of the R in TRUST? If you compare it to coppercoins (seen here:...
Maybe it's just the photos, but the color looks off...possibly cleaned?
Definitely a nice doubled die. Very clear notching and separation. Congrats Jay!
I agree with Jody.
It's damage.
In the link you provided, read that The reverse side is the anvil die, so I don't believe that mechanical doubling rim restricted design...
It's not called a "fill", a "fill" would indicate a struck-through error and would result in the loss of the design. What you have appears to be a...
Mechanical doubling. Not a doubled die. Keep up the hunt!
I can actually almost 100% assure you it's not what you think it is. Why? Rim-restricted design duplication leaves a set of RAISED elements, yours...
Looks like solder, which would make it post-mint damage. Not an error.
I think it's just a damaged rim...
Looks like a nice lamination error. :) It might command a nice small premium on ebay.
Definitely appears to be a nice doubled eyelid. If you can't find a match, definitely looks listable.
Some people get free submissions if they submit some number of coins, so they might as well send in a few extra in hopes that they grade high...
I am referring to the date when I say mechanical doubling. The doubling has a "step down" appearance. It isn't fully raised like the actual date....
I love the mottled rainbow toning of that 1932-S! Very nice. (Oh...and those Capped Bust Halves are to die for. ;) )
The way it appears on both sides and can be seen as displaced metal on the rim makes me think it is post-mint damage.
Your coin is damaged and worn...not a doubled die. Keep up the hunt!
Separate names with a comma.
