Edited for the sake of keeping the thread on course.
Perhaps I don't understand, but why is this coin of certification interest? Were you planning on sending it to a TPG? It looks like a normal, low...
I paid about $11 for it.
It's a calf. :D Newest pickup today, enjoy. Simon [ATTACH]
1913, AG (possibly corroded?)
I see no evidence of doubling. There is 0% chance of this being 001 as well because the mintmark position is not the same.
In this case I retract my original statement and agree with Rick. The letters must be equally spaced for a wide AM variety.
What is the date of the coin? I would guess late 80s...looks like a wide AM to me, but not sure.
Got a new ancient in the mail last week, just getting around to posting it. :) Philip II of Macedon, 359-336 BC, AE18 Obv: Head of Apollo facing...
You personally could've gotten more out of it? Do you have secret powers that make people buy it for more? :D I agree that although it is a key...
Looks unusual...can't tell if it is raised or infuse, but either way I would probably attribute it to plating issues. (post 1982 cents are made up...
Not seeing any split serifs...I'd be inclined to say MD.
That's exactly what happened...the plating around the mintmark rotted and left an impression.
Looks like extreme die wear.
Plating issues...zinc rot.
[ATTACH]
Got a capped bust half and a half cent for sale. Looking to sell off some of my collection so I can get my collecting priorities on a straighter...
Wow Caz, our coins look pretty similar. :D Twins? (I know that 1829 had an issue with weak strikes as well)
Damaged coin.
Separate names with a comma.
