[ATTACH]
I see a normal 1968 dime...worth 10 cents.
It is flat and shelf-like...what you have is mechanical doubling and not a doubled die. Keep up the hunt!
Yep...I see 2 additional hubbings, making for a total of a tripled die variety. :)
1829/7 Bust Half, my first overdate coin ever. :) [ATTACH]
Yep...what rick said. Not an S...just environmental damage.
Congrats on completing your set! I'm in the midst of it myself...missing a few of the better dates, plus the big ones like 1914-D, 09S, 09S VDB....
Uh...even the original poster of this thread said it was a 2006, and THEY had it in hand. The date is definitely identifiable.
It's 2006...the date is damaged but the last 2 numbers are identifiable...
Welcome. Your coin was damaged. I would recommend this site for you to check out about coin errors: error-ref.com.
3-5 cents each.
Ok, so just for clarification, this is NGC saying it and not the mint? I guess part of the issue is it is all in the interpretation of an...
That is die deterioration doubling.
I suppose that is certainly one take on it and I respect that. Do you have a link where the US mint something along the lines of die clashes are...
A struck through is considered an error, and does not directly have to do with a mechanical mishap. I suppose I would consider die breaks and cuds...
Nice, but cleaned.
Definitely looks like die 7. Nice find, Rick. :)
Abraded dies: technically an error, although I see it more of a result to remove an error rather than create one. If it ends up removing part of...
Hmm...I disagree with the thought that a die clash is neither an error or a variety. It is caused by a malfunction in the striking chamber and...
That is just a mangled cent...there is no event during the minting process that could result in the coin you see.
Separate names with a comma.
