Correct. Coins struck by a particular doubled die will show the same exact doubling. Your coin does not show the same doubling as 1DO-001 (or any...
I see no evidence whatsoever of ANY doubled die, much less the incredibly rare 1DO-001.
`988 is like a lesser known year for the no initials "variety", kind of like the 1969-D "No FG". Some people are holding onto them in hopes they...
It is die deterioration doubling, which is known as the "poor man's doubled die" despite not being a doubled die at all.
I don't see a doubled die from the pictures provided. I would recommend more researching on prominent doubled dies for a certain year and focusing...
20.
It's not a DDO. I see MD on LIBERTY and damage on the date.
I do not see any evidence of a die clash.
Looks like a normal RDV-005 in my opinion.
The 8 has simply been flattened. It is not a doubled die.
There are many coins with known rotations of well over 90°. The last known major rotation can be found on some 1994 cents, with a rotation of...
It's a 1976 with damage.
Your 1988 cents have the normal RDV-005, and the 1970-S is a large date with no apparent varieties.
Hard to detect luster from the photos. I'm gonna be conservative and say 35.
I've got some misaligned errors for him. I'll sell it to him for a cheap, cheap price of $20 per coin, and he can make an $80 profit off each one!...
Well I'd have to go with either 61 or 62. Absolutely stunning coin...
That's a common area for a die break, sometimes referred to as a "hornet's nest" die break.
If you look at the link and then look at your coin, you should notice that they do not look similar. The thing about doubled dies is the die is...
Your coin is definitely not MS64. I'd say it is in the AU range.
Looks possibly cleaned IMO...
Separate names with a comma.
